by Drew Stephens | Apr 21, 2024 | Diversity Equality Inclusion DEI, Politics, Social Identity Politics
Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are organizational frameworks that seek to promote the fair treatment and full participation of all people, particularly groups who have historically been underrepresented or subject to discrimination based on identity or disability.
In the present era, there has been a notable surge in the favorability of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) endeavors. These endeavors have garnered extensive approval and have extended their reach to encompass nearly every facet of our everyday existence, such as employment, education, and interpersonal relationships. Nevertheless, individuals need to be made aware of the meaning of DEI, its importance, and its influence on our community. It is crucial to acknowledge that DEI is essentially a rebranded version of socialism, representing a modern and administrative interpretation of socialism.
The concept of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) mirrors the principle of communism, “from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs,” which was prevalent during the era of Karl Marx. This philosophy emphasizes the importance of fair allocation and distribution of resources while also utilizing differentiation to accomplish its objectives. Understanding DEI efforts requires recognizing that equity is the driving force behind them. Equity serves as the primary objective of all DEI programs, aiming to compel diverse groups of individuals to achieve a “fair” redistribution of resources, status, and wealth based on neo-Marxist Identity Theories such as Critical Race Theory. Equity represents a managed political system in which allocations are adjusted to ensure equality among citizens, including social and cultural capital. Essentially, it signifies an extension of socialist principles. Once we grasp the essence of equity, the intentions behind “Diversity” and “Inclusion” initiatives become evident.
“The idea of “Diversity” is a deceptive plan. Its main objective is to place people with the same political views in organizations to implement policies promoting equality. These individuals, known as “Diversity Officers,” are similar to the previous concept of commissars
If you are unfamiliar with Commissars
Commissars were individuals functioning independently from the military chain of command. They were a link between the party and the regular troops, disseminating political messages and quelling any potential discord.
Commissars were responsible for overseeing communist political propaganda and instilling the public with communist ideology. Starting from 1917, the Bolshevik administration, similar to the preceding Provisional Government, depended on seasoned (former Tsarist) army officers despite harboring doubts about their loyalty—much like the Diversity officers within Corporate America!
(As mentioned above) who similarly enforced socialism. Understanding the real nature of Diversity in this context is easy, but how did we get here in America? The answer lies in the judiciary’s flawed interpretation of Civil Rights laws, which prioritizes the notion of “disparate impact” over intention as evidence of discrimination.
The Marxist Roots of DEI
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives have taken over the country, reaching into every aspect of our work, school, and lives. In pushing for equal outcomes, equity is deeply delusional. The first delusion is that 100% can be the top 1%.
The constraints of scarcity and efficiency necessitate equity to provide the minimum acceptable level; this is the sole method to ensure equal results. It is not coincidental that benchmarks decrease when equity precedes merit. Once more, the optimistic pledge of equity is an illusion; equity ultimately hinders our progress.
Equity, as an unsuccessful illusion, fails to produce the intended results and to fulfill equity’s pledges, equity openly appropriates. It is no shock that Marx recognized long ago that achieving Communist Liberation necessitated the abolition of property rights – in other words, state-endorsed confiscation. However, equity also involves confiscating accomplishments, contributions, and personal rights.
The principle of “Inclusion” plays a vital role in implementing the “Diverse and Equitable” commissar system. (As mentioned prior)
However, it is crucial to acknowledge that its interpretation deviates from the commonly accepted understanding. Instead of fostering genuine inclusivity, it is employed as a tool to enforce censorship and purges, resembling the practices observed in Communist regimes. The strategies employed in the pursuit of “Inclusion” and its expansion into “Belonging” are manipulative tactics reminiscent of Mao Zedong’s “unity, criticism, unity” approach. This approach aimed to infiltrate institutions and reshape societal values towards socialism or in this context, equity.
Conclusion
The DEI framework presents a substantial challenge to the fundamental principles of American society, eroding our cultural institutions and endorsing a detrimental framework that undermines resilience, substituting it with vulnerability and eradicating fair competition within American society, the American workforce, and our family structures. Additionally, it gives precedence to race over merit. Equity falsely suggests that anyone can attain the top 1%, disregarding the importance of merit, guaranteeing favorable outcomes for all, and engaging in socialist-like redistribution and expropriation under a different guise. Within the DEI framework, equity is inherently discriminatory towards the foundation upon which our four fathers intended our country to operate.
by Drew Stephens | Apr 19, 2024 | Critical Race Theory, Diversity Equality Inclusion DEI, Social Identity Politics
Many politicians in our country have failed to prioritize the well-being of the people they represent. Instead, they often prioritize personal agendas and engage in corrupt behavior. If we hope to change the course of our nation’s history, we must address the root causes of these issues. However, it’s important to note that patriots will resist any attempts to undermine our country’s freedoms.
If you haven’t seen my latest episode on Critical Race Theory, I encourage you to listen because this episode has a lot to do with the weaponization of Critical Race Theory through a group called Black Lives Matter. An organization founded by lesbian feminists with Marxist ideologies that oppose traditional family values, promote LGBTQ rights, and advocate for reproductive rights, demonstrates a strong inclination towards anti-American and pro-communist beliefs. BLM is involved in destructive behaviors like rioting, arson, looting, defacing historical and religious landmarks, and mistreating law enforcement officers in major urban centers
The lack of action from political leaders allowed the emergence of the Black Lives Matter movement. Some see it as rooted in Marxist ideology, which emphasizes racial identity and identity politics. Critics argue that it threatens our institutions, religious freedoms, and the unity of the family.
I would like to provide you with a summary of critical race theory. Critical race theory, an academic concept over 40 years of history, posits that race is a social construct. It argues that racism is not solely a result of individual bias or prejudice but is ingrained in all of our institutions and policies.
The fundamental principles of critical race theory, or CRT, were developed as a legal analysis framework in the late 1970s and early 1980s by legal scholars Derrick Bell, Kimberlé Crenshaw, and Richard Delgado, among others. This theory is being utilized to challenge our cultural institutions, undermine our nationalism, question our religious beliefs, dismantle the nuclear family structure, and challenge the core values that define us as Americans. It is often viewed as a Marxist ideology, seen as a revolutionary movement.
Now that you know the definition of Critical Race Theory, Let’s discuss how it’s being weaponized in our Society. The legislation, enacted in a few states, aims to weaponize Critical Race Theory (CRT), an academic concept with more than 40 years of history. CRT posits that American institutions are fundamentally racist.
Weaponized Critical Race Theory
- As a Tool, CRT – is utilized to enforce cancel culture, which involves boycotting or publicly shaming individuals or groups with differing views or those accused of social justice violations. CRT advocates believe this method is crucial in eradicating racism and advancing equality. On the other hand, opponents argue that it suppresses freedom of speech and fosters an environment where only a single viewpoint is accepted.
- CRT -involves the politicization of educational establishments. Advocates of CRT assert that it’s imperative in school curricula to enable students to comprehend the historical aspects of racism in America and its present repercussions. Nevertheless, detractors argue that this approach seeks to indoctrinate young minds with a specific political ideology and foster division within classrooms. Consequently, numerous states have prohibited the instruction of CRT in schools, while some have mandated its inclusion in the curriculum.
- The utilization of CRT as a weapon has resulted in allegations of hypocrisy. Critics claim that advocates of CRT frequently employ the same language and tactics they criticize in others. For instance, they might label others as racist or biased due to their race or gender, all the while maintaining biased opinions about specific groups.
The various factors have led to a contentious discussion regarding the effectiveness of CRT in contemporary society. Advocates of CRT assert that it is essential in addressing systemic racism and advancing equality. Conversely, opponents argue that it fosters division and perpetuates an oppressive environment that stifles differing viewpoints.
Americans as a whole need to delegitimize Black Lives Matter. We know that critical race theory is the basis of their movement.
“Michelle Obama said Barack knows we’re going to have to make sacrifices, change our conversation, and change our traditions.” OUR TRADITIONS? No, I don’t think so, Big Mike!!!
And I quote, Barack Obama has always been a communist people, from inception. From the age of 24, while he was at the University of Columbia, he wasn’t racist. Pick up his book; it’s ridiculous. Get this through your thick skull, Big Mike. Big Mike, you’re not going to change our history. You won’t rewrite history; “WE THE PEOPLE” will not allow it!
Critical Race Theory is an analytical framework that some argue intentionally creates division within our culture. -viewed as a version of Critical Theory tailored for Western democratic societies. Critical Theory, in general, may not be well-received in Western culture or a Republic. The academic version of Critical Race Theory is of little concern to some, as it identifies a new group to blame for societal issues – in this case, people of color who have experienced oppression and hardship in the United States, such as Hispanics, Blacks, Chinese, and Indigenous individuals.
Conclusion
CRT should be banned from educational institutions and completely eradicated from libraries, classrooms, and our society as a whole. It hurts the vulnerable minds of our young generation. Once again, CRT is an offshoot of Critical Theory, a social and political philosophy movement that originated from the Frankfurt School. Critical theorists, influenced by Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud’s ideas, argue that philosophy’s primary goal is to understand and challenge the oppressive social structures that dominate and suppress individuals. In simpler terms, it aims to dismantle cultural institutions in the United States. Max Horkheimer, who escaped Germany before the Nazi occupation, arrived in the United States via Geneva, Switzerland, and eventually ended up at Columbia University in New York, where he laid the groundwork for Critical Theory in the Western context, now known as Critical Race Theory. Let us not be deceived by this movement. BlackLivesMatter has embraced this ideology, which is a form of Marxism.